Carolyn Wilshire

From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
ResearchGate

Carolyn Wilshire, PhD., is a Senior Lecturer at Victoria University of Wellington, School of Psychology, Wellington, New Zealand. She specializes in Language, Aphasia, Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology, Cognitive Neuroscience.

Education[edit | edit source]

  • PhD - University of Cambridge
  • BSc - (Hons) Monash University

Notable studies/articles on ME/CFS[edit | edit source]

  • 2020, Conceptualising illness and disease: reflections on Sharpe and Greco (2019)[1] - (Full text)
  • 2019, Response: Sharpe, Goldsmith and Chalder fail to restore confidence in the PACE trial findings[2] - (Full text)
  • 2018, Rethinking the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome — A reanalysis and evaluation of findings from a recent major trial of graded exercise and CBT[3] - (Full Text)
  • 2017, The problem of bias in behavioural intervention studies: Lessons from the PACE trial[4] - (Full text)
  • 2017, Can patients with chronic fatigue syndrome really recover after graded exercise or cognitive behavioural therapy? A critical commentary and preliminary re-analysis of the PACE trial[5] - (Full text)
  • 2017, PACE trial claims of recovery are not justified by the data: a rejoinder to Sharpe, Chalder, Johnson, Goldsmith and White (2017)[6] - (Full text)
  • 2015, Psychogenic explanations of physical illness: Time to examine the evidence[7] - (Full Text)

Talks and interviews[edit | edit source]

Online presence[edit | edit source]

See also[edit | edit source]

Learn more[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Wilshire, Carolyn; Kindlon, T (2020). "Conceptualising illness and disease: reflections on Sharpe and Greco (2019)" (PDF). Medical Humanities. 46 (4): 532–536. doi:10.1136/medhum-2019-011756.
  2. Wilshire, C; Kindlon, T (2019). "Response: Sharpe, Goldsmith and Chalder fail to restore confidence in the PACE trial findings" (PDF). BMC Psychology. 7: 19. doi:10.1186/s40359-019-0296-x.
  3. Wilshire, C; Kindlon, T; Courtney, R; Matthees, A; Tuller, D; Geraghty, K; Levin, B (2018). "Rethinking the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome—A reanalysis and evaluation of findings from a recent major trial of graded exercise and CBT". BMC Psychology. 6: 6. doi:10.1186/s40359-018-0218-3.
  4. Wilshire, Carolyn (2017). "The problem of bias in behavioural intervention studies: Lessons from the PACE trial". Journal of Health Psychology. 22 (9): 1128–1133. doi:10.1177/1359105317700885.
  5. Wilshire, C; Kindlon, T; Matthees, A; McGrath, S (2017). "Can patients with chronic fatigue syndrome really recover after graded exercise or cognitive behavioural therapy? A critical commentary and preliminary re-analysis of the PACE trial". Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior. 5 (1): 43–56. doi:10.1080/21641846.2017.1259724.
  6. Wilshire, Carolyn; Kindlon, T; McGrath, S (2017). "PACE trial claims of recovery are not justified by the data: a rejoinder to Sharpe, Chalder, Johnson, Goldsmith and White". Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior. 5 (1): 62–67. doi:10.1080/21641846.2017.1259724.
  7. Wilshire, Carolyn; Ward, Tony (2015). "Psychogenic explanations of physical illness: Time to examine the evidence". Perspectives on Psychological Science 2016. 11 (5): 606–631. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1344.7125.