MEpedia:Manual of style

From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Revision as of 03:41, January 25, 2020 by Pyrrhus (talk | contribs) (remove duplicate shortcut. Note: no change to content.)

The following offers some style guidance for writing articles on MEpedia. Some of this requires familiarizing yourself with some of the basic formatting code used by MediaWiki, the software that powers both Wikipedia and MEpedia.

Key conventions[edit | edit source]

  • Page titles and section headings: Always capitalise the first letter of page titles and links, subsequent words must start with a lower case letter (eg "Post-exertional malaise", "Muscle fatigability") unless they are proper names (eg "Royal Free Hospital", "Nancy Klimas", "United States") or acronyms (eg "HHV-6", "IL-7").
  • Use of plurals in titles: Normal page articles should normally use the singular while category page articles should use the plural form.
  • Chronological order: put oldest first, e.g., for Notable studies 2010 would go before 2018.
  • #MEAction colors:
    width="450px"
    red #E7453A, blue #0BA7CD, light gray a solid equivalent to #3B3E3F 50% fill - use rgba(59,62,63,0.5) for transparency or , dark gray #3B3E3F, white #FFFFF, use templates for colors, e.g.:
<span style="color:{{MEActionRed}}">This is red.</span>
<span style="color:{{MEActionBlue}}">This is blue.</span>
<span style="color:{{MEActionGray}}">This is (light) gray.</span>
<span style="color:{{MEActionDGray}}">This is dark gray.</span>

Dates and numbers[edit | edit source]

Shortcuts:
  • MOS:DATE
  • MOS:DATEUNIFY

Dates[edit | edit source]

Dates should be in a consistent form and in US format: Jun 26, 2018; Jun 2018; or when the month is unknown, 2018. When manually inputting citations, use Jun 26, 2018; Jun 2018; or when the month is unknown, 2018.Dates entered in a different formatted, eg 2018-11-12, are automatically displayed using the MEpedia standard by the CS1 module.

Numbers[edit | edit source]

Shortcut:
  • MOS:NUM

Names and titles[edit | edit source]

The first time a person is mentioned in an article, their full name, title and relevant highest degree(s) should be described in detail to provide context for the reader (e.g. Dr. Jane Doe, PhD, a professor of Immunology at the University of Y). From then on, they should be referred to only by last name, e.g. Doe (unless you need to add their first name, Jane Doe, to distinguish from a mention of John Doe.)

Dashes[edit | edit source]

Shortcut:
  • MOS:DASH

Two forms of dash are used on MEpedia: en dash () and the longer em dash (). To enter them, click on them in the Visual Editor's toolbar to the right of the "Insert" dropdown beneath the edit window, or enter them manually as &ndash; or &mdash;, respectively. Do not use a double hyphen (--) to stand in for a dash.

Punctuation and footnotes[edit | edit source]

Shortcuts:
  • MOS:PUNCTFOOT
  • MOS:REFPUNCT

Punctuation should appear before (rather than after) footnotes where possible.

Layout[edit | edit source]

Shortcut:
  • MOS:LAYOUT

Lead paragraph[edit | edit source]

Shortcut:
  • MEpedia:Lead paragraph

Each entry should begin with a paragraph providing a summary of the whole. If the entry is very long, two or three paragraphs may be warranted.

Notable studies[edit | edit source]

The “Notable studies” section should list studies in chronological order and cite studies with a footnote, rather than an external link. However, following the footnote, you may optionally wish to add a parenthetical with external links to the paper's abstract or full text for reader convenience:

  • 1993, How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine[1] (Abstract)

See also[edit | edit source]

The “See also” section is a list of links to other relevant MEpedia entries. In the event the list becomes unwieldy, consider trimming to only subjects not yet linked elsewhere in the entry. However, the importance of a given related topic may take precedence.

Other guidelines[edit | edit source]

Learn more[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Rubin, H. R.; Redelmeier, D. A.; Wu, A. W.; Steinberg, E. P. (May 1993). "How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine". Journal of General Internal Medicine. 8 (5): 255–258. ISSN 0884-8734. PMID 8505684.