Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Search
Editing
Talk:Multiple chemical sensitivity
(section)
From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit source
New topic
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== On This is a Potential comorbidities page == I wondered how we can resolve whether it is or isn't a comorbidity. I know the US Coalition on ME/CFS consensus from last year said it was, but I'm really not up on other ME/CFS stuff. I think removing the banner would look better if it can be agreed either way. Thanks <br>[[User:Aletheia2020|Aletheia2020]] ([[User talk:Aletheia2020|talk]]) :A page is expected to objectively weigh the evidence for and against considering a condition as a comorbidity. As much as possible, we leave it up to the reader to draw their own conclusions. Because of this, we recently renamed our "Comorbidities" category to "Potential comorbidities", in order to let the page itself weigh the evidence, and in order to let the reader come to their own conclusion. ::[[User:Pyrrhus]] OK, got it. Thanks [[User:Aletheia2020|Aletheia2020]] ([[User talk:Aletheia2020|talk]]) 03:26, February 12, 2020 (EST)Aletheia2020 :These sorts of debates just don't belong in category-naming decisions. Categories are simply a convenient way to group articles, nothing more, and we don't want to complicate things by politicizing category names. We did the same thing with the "Treatments" category, which is now called "Potential treatments". With that said, the banner is indeed ugly and distracting. We have developed a better banner and are (still) waiting for our technical people to finally implement the better banner. For the time being, we just have to put up with the current ugly and distracting banner... ::[[User:Pyrrhus]] OK. That's good to know. Yes, it's very dominating as it is atm. [[User:Aletheia2020|Aletheia2020]] ([[User talk:Aletheia2020|talk]]) 03:26, February 12, 2020 (EST)Aletheia2020 :Hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any further questions. :[[User:Pyrrhus|Pyrrhus]] ([[User talk:Pyrrhus|talk]]) 21:07, February 10, 2020 (EST) ::Oops, [[User:Aletheia2020]], I forgot to mention that the word "comorbidity" on MEpedia has a specific meaning: it means a condition that is statistically more likely to be found in the original condition, than it is to be found in the general population. I only mention that since there are other definitions out there... ::[[User:Pyrrhus|Pyrrhus]] ([[User talk:Pyrrhus|talk]]) 21:28, February 10, 2020 (EST) ::::[[User:Pyrrhus]] OK, noted. I'll stick with your definition. [[User:Aletheia2020|Aletheia2020]] ([[User talk:Aletheia2020|talk]]) 03:26, February 12, 2020 (EST)Aletheia2020
Summary:
Please make sure your edits are consistent with
MEpedia's guidelines
.
By saving changes, you agree to the
Terms of use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 3.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
This page is a member of a hidden category:
Category:Pages with reference errors
Navigation
Navigation
Skip to content
Main page
Browse
Become an editor
Random page
Popular pages
Abbreviations
Glossary
About MEpedia
Links for editors
Contents
Guidelines
Recent changes
Pages in need
Search
Help
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs