Editing MEpedia talk:Editorial guidelines
From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*'''relevant''' to ME | *'''relevant''' to ME | ||
* about a '''notable''' topic, and | * about a '''notable''' topic, and | ||
* cite some '''reliable''', '''independent''' sources connecting the topic to ME. | * cite some '''reliable''', '''independent''' sources connecting the topic to ME.<br /><br />Pages with limited or no relevance may be [[MEpedia:Deletion policy|deleted]], for example an article about a doctor who treats ME is not relevant unless the doctor is a also specialist in ME, a researcher in ME, an advocate or activist for ME, or similar. Simply treating a few patients with ME as part of their normal practice would not be relevant or significant enough. Similarly, an article about a book written by someone with ME is only relevant of the book is primarily about ME. MEpedia pages must be '''neutral''', not '''promotional'''. | ||
Pages with limited or no relevance may be [[MEpedia:Deletion policy|deleted]], for example an article about a doctor who treats ME is not relevant unless the doctor is a also specialist in ME, a researcher in ME, an advocate or activist for ME, or similar. Simply treating a few patients with ME as part of their normal practice would not be relevant or significant enough. Similarly, an article about a book written by someone with ME is only relevant of the book is primarily about ME. MEpedia pages must be '''neutral''', not '''promotional'''. | |||
''Plus at the end, a list of relevant pages, e.g. - '' | ''Plus at the end, a list of relevant pages, e.g. - '' |